Covert Surveillance footage was obtained in respect of mainly showing the subject both outside his premises, behind railings, but in full public view, and walking from his home with his child and dog to/from school. All recordings were taken from a public place/where the public had access. On [date redacted], video evidence was obtained of particular relevance to the subject’s case. The footage was obtained from a public place showing the subject, just inside the gable-end

The central issue before the Court in this application is how the surveillance evidence has been obtained, processed and disclosed and whether there are such significant flaws in the processes adopted by the Defendant’s agents that the Court should refuse permission for the Defendant to rely on such evidence. The law relating to surveillance evidence and the exclusion of such evidence- 9 I am told by counsel that they have not been able to identify any authorities that spec

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Irish courts accept such evidence where it is gathered lawfully, proportionately, and in response to genuine concerns - such as suspected exaggeration or dishonesty. However, any intrusion into a claimant's privacy must be justified, and covert surveillance without cause is likely to backfire. “The Role of Private Investigators in Personal Injury Litigation: A Vital Tool for Insurance Defence” A Blog by Damian McGeady (Partner) - Lacey Solicitors Link: